Test for new item tree:
Title[]
| Toy sword | Short sword | Gladius | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
^Up
Research cycle. Each cycle could have their own table. Each item name is linked, for the moment, to its individual page until it's decided what we're going to do. I'm thinking these could go on the item page and when we link the names, they could link to their spot on the group pages (horiz itembox below) |
Test for horizontal itembox (only used items will show up):
Item Name[]
| Item name | Requirements | Resources | 
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
|
 1
 1
 1
 1
| |||||
| ? | ? | ? | ? | 0 |
| Research Cycle | General Buyers | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
| Toy sword > Short sword > Gladius | Items that can be suggested in place of this one. |
|
|
^Top
Cycle/Buyers/Suggestions boxes are a separate table, not another infobox to make it possible for people to insert the data themselves. |
|
|
> Right
I think this key could go at the top of the page since two of the icons aren't typically used. |
| Key | |
|
|
Craft Time |
|---|---|
|
|
Research Time |
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
Recipe Price |
|
|
Tokens |